Trying new editor

I thought I’d try a new blog editor as as much as I like the openoffice.org plugin allowing posting to blogs, I do find it low on features such as multiple categories and images in posts. So today and for the next week or so I’ll be using Scribefire to see what it can do.
Scribefire basically a multi-featured text editor that sits within Firefox and as such will run on any platform that Firefox runs on. I’m using Linux. At first glace it appears well laid out an intuitive.
Now to see if this will post….

Fedora 10 or Debian 5

I have been a Debian user for a few years now and I’ve used some of it derivitives like Mepis, Sidux, Ubuntu being the main three. I decided to give fedora 10 a try as the first flovour of Linux I tried was Red Hat 7.3 and that worked really well.

It’s been 4 weeks now or so, and to start with I was really impressed. Its big improvement over Fedora 9. It is quicker to boot, quicker to run and stable. It looks good too. I am running the x86_64 version and I am impressed with the range of software available and some strange stuff like BloGTK which is normally a 32 bit application. (Not that I actually use it now, waiting for version 2). So it is quite good but can I live with it?

The proplems I have with Fedora 10 are several. The log-in theme isn’t changable which is no great train smash, but virtually on every other distro you can, and this has been reported on in the forums.. The other problem I had was with java. Not all java apps would work on Fedora although they work fine on other distros. The only thing I can put this down to is the java the Fedora uses. I even downloaded from Sun and installed that, but it just wouldn’t work. I had a feeling it was probably something I was doing, or may be not doing. The network manager doesn’t appear to be improved, and is positively slow at reconnecting (if it does at all) espically after being idle for a while and the screen saver has been running.

The good points are that it is a big improvement over Fedora 9. It boots faster, seems relatively quick, and most things “work out of he box” including compiz and the wobbly windows (something my wife giggles about). The updating of the system seems more stable but that and installing extra applications does seem slow.

There is also something about Fedora which I can’t put my finger on that I’m just not sure about. It seems to give the sense of stablity and solidity but underneath there is a sense of fragility, but this fagility seems supported by a structure which takes away the inherent flexability that I have found in other distros. (I’ve seen a similar structure in Suse). May be this is there because this distro has commercial roots and done to stop or reduce the local user from messing with and breaking the system.

So, the answer I asked earlier, can I live with Fedora 10? The simple answer is No.

Now that Debian 5 is out, and I’ve updated my “testing” to Lenny I’ve found that it runs slickly and is stable. All my java apps work fine. One thing I do do is add the mepis and mepis-community repos to the list so I can run stable and updated apps like Openoffice.org v3, the gimp, inkscape, and a few others albeit not many. I have also been running virtual box of which I will write more at a later date. Debian 5 “Lenny” runs smoothly by which I mean that all applications seem to run at the same speed depending on what I am doing. It seems to manage the resources in a more even handed way. The network manager works fine and reconnects quickly when there’s been an interuption. I prefer to use wicd network manager, seems really stable and intuitive (a most important atribute).

I find debian easier to configure to my liking. This may be due to the fact that I’ve been using Debian longer and therefore have become familiar with all the quirks if Debian. Be that as it may, Debian does seem to have similarities with other distros within the file system and where certain files are kept. It seems to be a less muck-about-with distro. There are certain aspects of Debian that annoy me, like not including various drivers on the cd’s/DVD’s, but the’re in the repos, just means I have to hardwire to router to download. That and the fact that Debian takes so long to release. But I can live with both cos it not difficult to download, and the stablity of Debian seems second to none.

All in all, it does a good job without making a song and dance about it.

My system crashed

My System Crashed!

I decided to install the Microsoft service pack 3 which went fine until I rebooted, then all mayhem broke loose. Windows XP booted to an unuseable system. I was not pleased. I was not ammused. My Linux partitions worked fine but were now under threat because the only way I could see to remedy this situation was to use the recovery disks I had made when I first bought this laptop. The recovery system reformats the whole disk, so everything goes, which is a real pain as all I needed to do was reinstall windows.

So after backing-up everytthing I went for the recovery disks. Doing this alowed me to re-think and re-organise the hard drive so as to have two large data partitions, an “everyday” partition, a “work” partition and a “ test partition”. So the hard drive would have XP (cos I have to have for my studies), SimplyMepis as the everyday system, Debian Lenny as the work system and Sidux as the test system. As you might of guessed, I like Debian. “And Ubuntu?” I hear you ask. No I don’t like Ubuntu as after each 6 months its like doing an install with a new system and you never know what you are going to get. Will it work fully or not? Enough of Ubuntu before I say too much and this becomes something its not meant to be!

So I did a recovery and reinstalled XP and all my favorite applications, which took the best part of 4 hours, and I’m still not finished. On the other side, installing Mepis, Sidux and Debian together took one and a half hours and an extra half hour to set-up java, flash and networking.

Sidux

Sidux was the first to go on. I decided to use Sidux bescause as I’m using debian as my main workspace Sidux will give me advace notice as to what is coming up and how well it works and do I need it. Sidux is also very fast and therefore should be good for working on batery, we’ll see. Sidux use kde, kde-lite or xfce desktops. Kde-lite was chosen so there is maximum choice as to what else is installed, almost like a minimum graffical install. I wish someone would do this for Gnome, a Gnome-lite. I live in hope!

Debian

Debian was next, even with the old text driven installer, there was a strange sence of comfort that I was installing an old friend. All went smoothly. The only thing I had to do was to connect to the internet through a wire the retreive the wireless drivers. After that all is sweet. I’ve added the Mepis repos and Mepis Community repos too and installed some of the latest applications that the Mepis community have put there.

I’ve also installed openbox window manager to replace the standard metacity window manager. This speeds up an already speedy laptop. The lastest wine and the free Crosover is also installed, with which I now have Dreamweaver MX and Flash MX running fine. All I need now is a way of getting Photoshop CS3 working… (these applications are needed for my sstudies, although I am also using Gimp, inkscape, and Quanta).

SimplyMepis

I must say to start with, I like Mepis. It isn’t prefect (it uses kde as its desktop) but underneath it is good and I quite like Warren’s views as to what a distro should be. I also like the way that a communty has gathered round and started using their skills and enthusiasm to help ans improve the(ir) distro. I first used SimplyMepis a few years ago when the Gnome desktop was supported along with Kde, this choice I liked as after trying a few desktops I prefer Gnome and fvwm. Mepis was installed last. All went smoothly and it found all the network cards automatically. I’ve setup gnome with openbox and fvwm-crystal as main deskops.

Ubuntu

In recent days I swapped Sidux for Ubuntu because I’d read that some people think its the best thing since sliced bread and as I hadn’t tried it for a while, I thought I’d give it a go. My conclusions are that some apps are old or out of date for what I need, think wine, and there was something about it that just didn’t feel right. At the moment I can’t put my finger on it, but there is something about it that makes me uncomfortable using it.

I have re-installed Sidux.

Grub

I have configured Grub to run from the Mepis partition and also from each partition so when booting up I have a choice of either the relevant kernel for the different systems or a link to a more specific menu for that partition. This alows me to update and upgrade the kernel and not have to manually update grub each time..

Desktop

I am using Gnome with openbox as the main desktop except for Sidux where it’ll run kde-lite. On all there is FVWM and FVWM-crystal. I have found that these two desktops with rox-filer rather intriging. I will be working on these as a side line just to see what they can do. One of the reasons I moved to Linux was that I felt that windows was becoming bloated and therefore slow, and I feel kde and gnome have been following this trait. I have a Toshiba laptop with 192meg ram, which runs linux very nicely, but I can’t run suse or fedora for the memory is too small for them. It can however run debian. FVWM (and crytal) are very light-weight. Just because more memory is available and becoming cheaper doesn’t mean you should use it. Just because a car can do 150 miles per hour doesn’t mean you should. I am using openoffice to write this and was thinking about how many of the tools and facilities availble to use I use. Very few. If openoffice made it modular so you only installed what was needed, then its “memory footprint” would be reduced.

I have also started looking at windowmaker. Amother lightweight desktop window manager. This is easier to configure than FVWM and the eye-candy is interesting.

Conclusions

I think the reason I’m not sure about Ubuntu si that it apears to be more of a fork of Debian rather than based upon. With other Debian based distros you can install various packages from either onto either, Mepis to Debian and Debian to Mepis, and it will not break, but with Ubuntu it is different. If you install an Ubuntu package onto a Debian system, you are likely to break it (personal experence), and from Debian to Ubuntu it might not work, even though Ubuntu uses the .deb package. A little bit like eing locked into the ubuntu system (reminds me of someone from Redmond). Shame. I will state here that I do understand that Ubuntu does contrbute back to Debian upstream.

Mepis is good and stable. The community continues to develop around it, although I have noticed some growing pains, but I think these are healthy. If the community continues to grow strongly and Warren continues to head it, I think Mepis could become better and easier than Ubuntu because it is made by users for users rather than developers.

Debian is the old trustworthy. Solid and dependable.

Sidux is fast and challanging.

I have been writing this over the last few weeks and keep adding to it on an almost daily basis, so I will publish now and post updates as to how I get on with the different desktops an which one I stick with.

Update: I’ve just installed Fedora 10 and I’m impressed…

Puppy Linux

There has been a bit of talk lately about Puppy Linux in the media, well, when I say media, I mean the media I read! So I thought I write my bit. I came across Puppy Linux quite a while back, I think it was in 2003, but it might of been 2004. Anyway, I found it interesting because it could do so much but packed into such a small package, a bit like DML, but more user friendly and more intuitive for those dragged up on windows. I also found that it didn’t quite work well enough on my hardware of the time, a Toshiba laptop. I also liked the idea of making your own custom version, a bit like "Pimp my Puppy", but never got round to doing it as I didn’t have the time. Another curious character of Puppy Linux was that it is developed in Australia. When I found this out, I understood some of its quirks! I have been to Australia and found they do things slightly different there, which is good. So Puppy Linux is different. Now with version 4.1 I have found it to be really useful. With mounting of drives and partitions and a partitioning tools along with anti-virus tools makes this distro a must have in my "help" box of cd’s. I’ve already helped out a couple of colleagues at work with it and I’m sure a few more will be helped out in the near future. Running Puppy Linux is a breeze from boot up through to desktop going through a keyboard config (which is straight forward) and a display config ( which I wish did an auto test before moving on) which isn’t as straight forward for someone without any knowledge of computers. Then comes setting up the internet connection. Again, for me quite straight forward, but for someone with limited knowledge of computers, they could become stuck… for a while. The wizard is good though and does explain everything well. (If only I’d read before trying!). Once up to desktop, everything is to hand and Puppy Linux zipps along at a good pace. I have a P3 700 Mhz machine with 192 Meg ram and this with Puppy will give a Core duo 1.6GHz with 1 Gig ram a rum for it money with debian Linux, and blows it out of the water with windoze. Personally, if you have an old PC or laptop that you’d like to get going and use or give away, Puppy is a way of doing this with a touch of style.

Technorati:

Powered by Bleezer

The Friday Letter – XP, Vista or Linux or Mac

My father-in-law is staying with us for a while. He decided to buy a laptop. After looking around he went for a Toshiba P300. A good big 17 inch laptop. It came with Vista, but he wanted XP on it. Why? Two reasons, firstly because he was going to run some heavy software and didn’t want Vista getting in the way, and secondly, familiarity. He knows XP and is happy with it.

One day, he might see the light and move over to Linux! The Mac didn’t have a look-in for several reasons. Its expensive for what it is. The Mac ties you into its brand, more so than Microsoft. And its unfamiliar. And the same with Linux for him is that it is unknown territory.

One thing that amazed me was when starting the machine (the P300) and booting into Vista, it had to reboot 8 times before we reached the usable desktop. Overall it took four and a half hours to back up Vista and then install XP and the extra standard applications like Firefox, Thunderbird, Openoffice3, AVG antivirus and Zonealarm firewall.

For me it is a different story. I came across Linux a few years back with a tripple cd pack on a magazine of Red Hat 7.3 and haven’t looked back. I can even run Linux in a window on XP from a USB stick. I now have a Lenovo R61 laptop. I do have XP on it but only because I am doing some studying and some of the software provided only runs on MS XP. I also have Linux on it. It is running Debian Lenny, which was so easy to install and get going. I had a full system up and running with the hour. Try that with XP or even Vista. I also have SimplyMepis8, which again was a dream to set up, and soon I’m going to try Puppy Linux. This is one I tried a while ago and just couldn’t get to grips with but now I feel it would be the best to get to know before I move on to LFS sometime next year. Why Linux? And why Debian Linux? I have tried a multitude of different distros (versions or flavours of Linux), Mandrake (now Mandriva), Fedora, Suse, Gentoo, Ubuntu (based on Debian) Slackware to name a few. There are a number that are based on one of the above like zenwalk and stax based on slackware and ubuntu and mepis based on debian which I have tried. I have come to enjoy using debian and mepis because they are stable as a rock and easy to install and straight forward to understand, and Mepis you can try without even installing. I haven’t had one crash. But obviously, where I have been tinkering with the system, normally on a test install, it has crashed a few times, but it is difficult to get it to crash. It is also secure. It runs smoother than windows, it runs quicker, it is more responsive, it is more configurable, and I can do everything that I want and need to do using it. One other thing I like about Linux is that it is free, and so is the software that you can use on it. And contrary to the MS advertising bandwagon, linux is easy to install and use. I think what holds people back is the unfamilularity with it, but if people would just give it a go, they would be so surprised as it is far more intuitive than MS. I am happy with my laptop running Deian Linux and confident in its ability to do what I want it to do, and that is to just work to allow me to do my work

Technorati:

Powered by Bleezer